by D. L. Adams

Islam is an all-encompassing belief system; it is a total civilization which includes a religion. The failure of our society to recognize this fact puts us all at a serious disadvantage vis a vis Islam, jihad, and Sharia law (Islamic law).

Yesterday, another atrocity perpetrated by a follower of the “religion of peace” occurred, this time outside of Phoenix, Arizona. Apparently, the father of a not-Islamic-enough 20-year old daughter decided that she had become “too western”. His “religion of peace” response – run her (and her friend) over with his car. This peaceful response on the part of the father in this case was meant to result in the death of the daughter (not “peace”). According to CNN, she is in the hospital with life-threatening injuries. CNN provides no details on the friend’s condition.

The “Arizona Republic” has several articles on this case, none of them on the front page of their site. Both victims remain in hospital today; the “peaceful” father is still at large.

Family and friends of the victims told detectives that the suspect had made threats toward his daughter because she was not living according to traditional Iraqi values, Tellef said. However, police cannot immediately determine whether that was the motive in the incident.(Arizona Republic)

What could the reporters of the “Arizona Republic” mean by “traditional Iraqi values”? Is there some Baathist tradition of parents killing their children because they aren’t Baathist enough? Is this some new “traditional value” that is post-Sadam? Or is this some Islamic tradition that is meant to destroy children who are leaving or who have left Islam? There is substantive precedent to believe that the cause of this barbarism and cruelty and homicidal intent on the part of the father in Arizona is a direct result of Islamic concepts and “legal” guidelines and obligations and nothing else. This attempted child murder is called an “honor killing”.

The ties of Islam override the ties of kinship, family, friendships, and national ties. The “umma” of Islam, the world-wide community of believers is more important to a Muslim (according to doctrine) than even those close ties of parent to child. Some believers take the doctrine more seriously than others.

In addition, when situations require there are often doctrinal bases upon which otherwise outre and repellent actions for an apparently “acculturated” believer living in some non-Islamic city such as Phoenix, Arizona where such things are unheard of and utterly rejected become “possible” and even preferential or “necessary” (to them). Muslims living in dar al-harb (the house of war) countries, that is countries that are not under Islamic rule and Sharia law are obligated to forward and strengthen Islam and to bring the kafir (non-believer) culture out of the world of jahiliyah (non-Islam; ignorance) into dar al-Islam.

There is a purpose to Muslim immigration. Mohammed was an immigrant from Mecca to Medina; immigration is foundational to the growth of Islam. <Heavy_sarcasm>When this adherent of the doctrine of Islam in Arizona, a follower of the religion of peace, saw that his daughter was leaving “the fold” what else could he do but try to kill her? </Heavy_sarcasm>

There is no greater sin in Islam than non-belief; it’s a greater sin than murder. Leaving Islam is an insult and dishonor not only to the family but to the entire community of Islam (the umma).

Islam supercedes all other ties, even the father/child bond.

Sira:Ishaq:807
So Abu Sufyan went to Medina as well. He stopped at the house of his daughter, who had submitted to Islam. Before he could step onto her sitting rug, she rolled it up. She explained that Mohammed had sat on the rug and she did not want her kafir, unclean father sitting on it.
…

Submission to Islam overrides everything in the life of the believer, as stated in Islamic doctrine.

Koran:9:24
Say: If your fathers and your sons and your brethren and your mates and your kinsfolk and property which you have acquired, and the slackness of trade which you fear and dwellings which you like, are dearer to you than Allah and His Apostle and striving in His way, then wait till Allah brings about His command: and Allah does not guide the transgressing people.
(Source)

Unbelievers, and those who have left Islam (apostates), are unclean.

Koran:9:28
O, believers, only the kafirs (the unbelievers) are unclean.

The character of a parent or a friend is irrelevant if they have not submitted to Allah and Mohammed.

Sira:Ishaq:455
(At the Battle of Badr)
As the bodies were thrown into the well, one of the Muslims saw the body of his father thrown in. He said, “My father was a virtuous, wise, kind, and cultured man. I had hoped he would become a Muslim, but he died a kafir. His abode is Hell-fire forever.

“The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used not to kill the children, so thou shouldst not kill them unless you could know what Khadir had known about the child he killed, or you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to he a believer (and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer), so that you killed the (prospective) non-believer and left the (prospective) believer aside.” — Sahih Muslim:019:4457

Khadir, or Khidr, figures in sura 18 of the Qur’an. He is traveling with Moses, and: “Then they proceeded: until, when they met a young man, he [Khadir] slew him. Moses said: “Hast thou slain an innocent person who had slain none? Truly a foul (unheard of) thing hast thou done!” Khadir replies: “As for the youth, his parents were people of Faith, and we feared that he would grieve them by obstinate rebellion and ingratitude (to Allah and man). So we desired that their Lord would give them in exchange (a son) better in purity (of conduct) and closer in affection….” (Koran:18:74, 18:80-81). (source)

Killing of those who leave Islam is sanctioned and encouraged in the doctrine of Islam.

Bukhari Hadith:9,83,17
Mohammed said, “the blood of a Mulsim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His apostle cannot be shed except in three cases: In equity for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims.”

Murder of those who leave Islam, no matter their relation to the murdering party is considered Sunna, that is it the path of Mohammed (this is found in the Sira of Mohammed). Mohammed (and Allah) said that this (killing of apostates) was to be done, and it is enshrined forever (until some reformation of Islam occurs) in Sharia law, the law of Islam.

The Reliance of the Traveller is the rule book of Sharia law. It is unequivocal about apostasy and its attendant results.

Islam is very much about control. All adherents are to submit to Islam, the doctrine and Sharia, and all are to be controlled and control one another based upon the rules. All kafirs, incidentally, are to be eventually brought under the control of Sharia law everywhere. This is the purpose of Islam.

Reliance of the Traveller:0o8:0
Leaving Islam is the ugliest form of unbelief and the worst.

o8:1
When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostasizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

f1:3
Someone raised among Muslims who denies the obligatoriness of the prayer, zakat, fasting Ramadan, the pilgrimage, or the unlawfulness of wine and adultery, or denies something else upon which there is scholarly consensus and which is known as being of the religion (N: necessarily known meaning things that any Muslim would know about if asked) thereby becomes an unbeliever (kafir) and is executed for his unbelief.
…

Islam is very clear about its purposes; its adherents follow their doctrine with varying degrees of intensity. When they do we see terrorism, violence and barbarism. The doctrine is very clear on these points. Jihad is the obligation of every believer. We just choose not to listen.

Islam is for the person who can’t stand to have to make choices, can’t stand to have to exercise moral sense, and wants, wants, wants, to be part of a faith that is collectivist. You are part of the Army of Islam, and once in, you can’t get out. You must owe your loyalty only to Islam and to fellow Muslims, never — in the slightest way — to non-Muslims or to any legal or political institutions or social arrangements that are the product of non-Muslim societies and peoples. It’s a Collectivist Faith, and because it purports to regulate every single area of life, it is a Totalitarian Faith. And while it has been from its inception, technological developments have given totalitarian movements the ability to more thoroughly penetrate and dominate the minds of those over whom they have a hold, whether the hold is mainly one limited to a specific state (as Nazi Germany, or Communist Soviet Union) or is a hold based on an ideology spread among True Believers not only in Islam-ruled lands but also in lands where non-Muslims have not yielded to Islam.
Hugh Fitzgerald

The anti-human attempted murder of the young woman in Phoenix, Arizona by her father has nothing to do with “traditional Iraqi values” but everything to do with the doctrine of Islam, Sharia law, and the adherence of a believer to this brutal and savage doctrine.

It would be a preferable thing if our “journalists” and “scholars” of the press would do their research so that such ridiculous and misleading statements as “traditional Iraqi values” are left out of their “reporting”.

This is another case of a parent responding in a doctrinally acceptable manner whose child has strayed from the path of Islam. This is similar to the Rifqa Bary case in Ohio/Florida which involves a young girl (17) who fled her parents after converting to Christianity from Islam. Ms. Bary said quite clearly that her father had threatened to kill her for leaving Islam.

It is shown above that the father in this appalling case is following his duty according to the doctrine of Islam and its “legal code” Sharia law.

Sharia law is fundamentally opposed to everything that our democracy stands for and everything that decent and inclusive American society means. In addition, it is opposed to our Constitution. It is opposed to our Constitution not only for the fact that it encourages the killing of children by parents but that it also states that no other law other than it, Sharia, can be in force. There are innumerable reasons why Sharia law must be opposed by decent Americans who love justice and freedom, and the rule of law.

The Constitution, Article 6, Clause 2 states that the Constitution is the “supreme law” of the land and that no other law shall supercede it. All lawmakers, law enforcement, military, and court officials across the United States take an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution.

Sharia law must be opposed everywhere as contrary to the fundamental rule of justice and law, and human rights as guaranteed in the Constitution.

No component of Sharia law anywhere in this country should be countenanced, allowed, or enacted. Our leaders are obligated by oath to oppose Sharia; they may be unaware of this – we must make all of them aware of it.

Tags: Apostasy, Bukhari, Constitution, Honor Killing, Ishaq, Reliance of the Traveller, Rifqa Bary, Sharia, Sira, Sunna

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 7:15 pm and is filed under Adams, Doctrine of Islam, Sharia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.